
|
That's true about family members, KH, but I guess that's another reason why it has to be the person's choice, and nobody else's.
Probably how you feel on this issue comes clear when you have someone that you care about greatly dies a horrible, slow, painful death. My Aunt died a few years ago, of cancer, and she wanted to have the option to die when things got too unbearable. I don't think she would have actually used it in the end. And this is the case for a lot of people. Just knowing you have the option can relieve a lot of the stress and worry. But seeing your body and mind deteriorate and knowing it's never going to get better, and it's only going to get a lot worse, and more painful, until you finally die... I can't even imagine.
It's not kind, it's not fair, it's inhumane.
|
|

|
And I guess there are times when you have that power in your hands. When it come time to make decisions about when to turn life support off, which could of course have family members divided also.
|
|
|

|
Yeah, that's actually viewed as a different issue though. That's stopping life extending treatment, as opposed to giving a medicine that will actually end life. One is passive (and legal), the other is active (and illegal).
|
|
|

|
Yeah, I was just thinking about it in terms of people managing to get through in those situations, even when there could be major conflict, during what could also be one of the most stressful situations.
|
3rd November '11, 10:12pm |
|
|
|