Moral hazard

Idiot / Savant

Idiot/Savant is an anonymous blogger living in exile.  He blogs about human rights, international affairs, and politics from a left - liberal perspective. Check out his blog

So, South Canterbury Finance has gone into receivership, and the government has obligingly bailed out its investors to the tune of $1.7 billion. Each and every New Zealander has effectively just paid $340 - half a week's wages - to refill the pockets of 35,000 investors too stupid to understand that high interest equals high risk.

/img/placeholder.gif?aHR0cDovL2k1OTYucGhvdG9idWNrZXQuY29tL2FsYnVtcy90dDQ1L2dldGZyYW5rLzA4MzAxMC9Tb3V0aC1DYW50ZXJidXJ5LUZpbmFuY2UuanBn

I think this displays perfectly the stupidity of including finance companies in the Retail Deposit Guarantee Scheme. Banks have customers, who are innocent victims in any collapse. Finance companies, OTOH, have investors, people who are effectively gambling. Guaranteeing them against losses is no different from guaranteeing the pokie zombies or TAB addicts - and just as pointless and reprehensible.

It also raises the question of what sorts of controls we have on the RDGS, and why companies like SCF were ever allowed to join it in the first place. Every insurance company in the world protects itself against the extremes of moral hazard - e.g. house and contents policies exclude owner-arson. I'd expect the RDGS to at least protect us from the financial equivalent. The fact that it apparently does not suggests extreme incompetence on the government's part, and something they should be held to account for.

 
Sort by
  • cobex says
    The whole notion of Bail outs is ridiculous. The investors received there higher than market returns because of the risk they knew was there and now that risk that ment they got more money forever has become so great they get no money or they get less then they expected.
    If anyone I though John Key would have known better, is does blow with the wind though.
  • Kizami says
    I weep for my $340 worth of well earned money. Totally agree that nullified risks is just going to keep making the whole country pay... for no benefit to the nation as a whole. You don't see the government 'bailing out' the poor little businesses going down like flies in the recession, and they might actually be doing some good for society (economy, communities, etc) But what really gets me is this enormous sum of money could be going into all of those neglected fields which NGOs work their arses off to survive.
  • Belinda says
    I've heard that the government has paid $405 for every man woman and child to take control of failed moneylender South Canterbury Finance's assets.

    This is horrendous as the Finance company lent money to people who no longer can repay it or on assets that no longer have any value. With the high interest they gave to the investors who are still going to receive those high interest rates compared to the people like in my family who have their money in the bank receiving a smaller amount of interest, but who know it is safe.

    It is a huge cost to the taxpayer for the ordinary Kiwi who's struggling to save for him or herself.
  • Timotheus says
    Right or wrong, it's pretty much what I expect from a National led government.

Post your comment

Want to have your say?

It's quick, easy and 100% free.

  •  

Features

  • Cocktails, Shots, & Drink Recipes Cocktails, Shots, & Drink Recipes

    Drink in style.

  • Funny Jokes Funny Jokes

    Updated daily for your twisted enjoyment...

  • Daily Video Daily Video

    Check out today's videos, they take up our broadband bandwidth but these Youtube clips are particularly worth it!

  • NZ Daily Deal Aggregator NZ Daily Deal Aggregator

    Save time - saving money. The best daily deals from around New Zealand pulled together onto one page & updated every 10 minutes.

  • Best Sex Positions Best Sex Positions

    Spice up your love life with Get Frank's list of best sex positions to wake the neighbours!

Competitions

Endorsed Events